IMPACT OF FDI ON THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR OF THE NIGERIAN ECONOMY
ATTENTION:
BEFORE YOU READ THE CHAPTER ONE OF THE
PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE
TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO
PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN
CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
IMPACT OF FDI ON THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR OF THE NIGERIAN
ECONOMY
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE
STUDY
The construction sector occupies a focal position in the
economy of any nation because it is an important contributor to the process of
development (Aje, 2008). In the conduct of economic activities, the
construction sector is always used by government as the stimulus for the
buoyancy of the economy (Akindoyemi, 2011). The construction industry is
therefore a critical factor or variable of progress in the drive for economic
advancement of nations, especially developing countries such as Nigeria.
Nigeria no doubt requires substantial amounts of foreign investment in the
construction sector to speed up her economic growth most especially in the area
of building and construction infrastructure/facilities investment and to
promote development, which will in turn boost GDP. The significance of foreign
capital for the provision of infrastructure development for both macroeconomic
and microeconomic activities of the society, cannot therefore, be
overemphasized.
Todero (2001) described infrastructure as the pillar of
growth in Africa and it is generally inadequate and of poor quality when
compared to developed nations of the world. Foreign capital has long been
accepted as an inevitable input in the development process, given the fact that
no country is an “island” with self sufficiency on her in terms of needed resources,
to stimulate economic growth and development (Orji, 2004). This is a
continuation from experience of some countries in South East Asia notably,
Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong (Ayo, 2008).
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD), (2002) succinctly described Foreign direct investment (FDI) as follows:
an integral part of the international economic system and a major catalyst for
development or the flow of capital and human resource from one country to
another. Foreign direct investment (FDI) is thus part of the economic system
that stimulates economic growth including infrastructural development. In view
of the role of foreign capital inflows as investment mechanism for economic
growth in most countries, it is a strong indicator of the economic strength of
Nations.
National policies and the international industrial
architecture obviously play a significant role in attracting FDI to most
countries and stimulating growth. For instance, Nigeria’s vision 20: 2020 sets strategies
and targets in every sector of the economy that are expected to ensure that the
country joins the group of twenty most developed economies in the next ten
years. Kolapo (2010) asserted that it is unfortunate that the palpable
bottleneck in the way of sustainable growth in Nigeria are only a clear
manifestation of five decades of dishonest and egocentric governance. Some
notorious past leaders had unwittingly given themselves away as incompetent by
saying that Nigeria’s problems defiled all logic. Discerning Nigerians only
need to study the development strategies of hitherto neglected African
countries to unveil real economic pests. In his view too, there is also lack of
effective interplay between leaders of African countries to provide the support
institutions and the dynamic domestic entrepreneurial class which is a key
success factor for attracting foreign direct investment.
Another major hindrance to FDI inflow in the continent is the
fact that a number of investors are not aware of the strides taken by African
countries towards development, as many of them limit their focus to political
stability, corruption and weak infrastructure (Eboh, 2011). It has been
observed that the infrastructural base of the Nigerian economy has remained
weak in the past decades. This is because of the low gross domestic savings of
developing Countries such as Nigeria, which is a major limitation in financing
infrastructural development (Orji, 2004), hence the need for foreign direct
investment (FDI) to maximize advantages such as managerial skills, marketing
connection, technical knowledge, technological transfer, training of local work
force and movement of hard currency into the country.
According to Mogbo (2004) and Egolum (2011) past governments
have made attempt in solving the problem by expressing determination to improve
basic infrastructures as a means of promoting economic development through soft
loans and grants from Multilateral Financial Institutions (MFIs) such as
International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and other lending nations. These
loans and grants are normally characterized with conditionality’s such as
budgets cuts in the social sectors; subsidy removal, leading to exchange rate
crisis, massive devaluation of local currency and terms of trade determination,
foreign content and expatriate usage, unemployment and underemployment (Egolum,
2011).
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM
A number of studies have been carried out on FDI and growth
in Nigeria with varying results and submissions. However, these studies did not
establish that most of the FDI was concentrated in the extractive industry. In
other words, it could be said that these works assessed the impact of investment
on the extractive industry (oil and natural resources) on Nigeria’s economic
growth and not the construction industry.
Based on afore mentioned facts and issues, it becomes
expedient to study and investigate the impact or adequacy of FDI on the
Nigerian construction industry. It is thus expected that this study, while
bringing to the fore, the extent of FDI impact or effect on the construction
sector, it will also show the significant response of the Nigerian construction
sector to FDI inflow in Nigeria. The study will also spur government
agencies/departments involved in foreign investment to identify and tackle the
hindrances of FDI flows with a view to enhancing the inflow of FDI in the
construction sector; since, as established, the sector is a potent motivator of
the national economy, providing the driving force necessary for either
sustaining a buoyant economy or reviving a depressed one.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE
STUDY
The following are the objectives of this study:
To assess the
impact of foreign direct investment on the construction sector in Nigeria.
To examine the rate
of inflow of foreign direct investment into the Nigerian construction sector.
To identify the
factors limiting the inflow of foreign direct investment into the Nigerian
construction sector
1.4 RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
What is the impact
of foreign direct investment on the construction sector in Nigeria?
What is the rate of
inflow of foreign direct investment into the Nigerian construction sector?
What are the factors
limiting the inflow of foreign direct investment into the Nigerian construction
sector?
1.5 HYPOTHESIS
HO: There is no significant relationship between foreign
direct investment and construction sector development in Nigeria.
HA: There is significant relationship between foreign direct
investment and construction sector development in Nigeria.
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF
THE STUDY
The following are the significance of this study:
The outcome of this
study will enhance the competitiveness and survival of Nigerian construction
industry in the global market and ultimately improve the contribution of the
construction sector to the national economy.
This research will
be a contribution to the body of literature in the area of the effect of
personality trait on student’s academic performance, thereby constituting the
empirical literature for future research in the subject area.
1.7 SCOPE/LIMITATIONS
OF THE STUDY
This study will cover the effect of foreign direct investment
on the construction sector of the Nigerian economy.
LIMITATION OF STUDY
Financial constraint- Insufficient fund tends to impede the
efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature
or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire
and interview).
Time constraint- The
researcher will simultaneously engage in this study with other academic work.
This consequently will cut down on the time devoted for the research work
HOW TO GET THE FULL PROJECT WORK
PLEASE, print the following
instructions and information if you will like to order/buy our complete written
material(s).
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount
(#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project
topics
(2) Email
Address
(3) Payment
Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after
we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 2023350498
Bank: UBA.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
AFFILIATE LINKS:
myeasyproject.com.ng
easyprojectmaterials.com
easyprojectmaterials.net.ng
easyprojectsmaterials.net.ng
easyprojectsmaterial.net.ng
easyprojectmaterial.net.ng
projectmaterials.com.ng
googleprojectsng.blogspot.com
myprojectsng.blogspot.com.ng
https://projectmaterialsng.blogspot.com.ng/
Comments
Post a Comment